On Imports and the Trade Balance

At the Cato Institute, director and global trade analyst Daniel Griswold writes that “the goal of US trade policy should not be to promote exports at the expense of imports, but to maximize the freedom of Americans to trade goods, service and assets in the global marketplace.”

Griswold writes on why exports are not the only stimulant for our economy, and why imports do not “subtract” from our GDP. He reminds us all what we first leaned in Economics 101: in calculating the balance of payments, that which flows out must flow back.

A common trap of protectionism is that trade barriers “restrict the healthy, circular flow of international trade in goods, services and assets”. The end result of protectionism is reduction of both imports and exports, thereby damaging domestic economies and weakening the market share for a country’s manufacturing sectors.

Read more in The Trade Balance Creed: Debunking the Belief that Imports and Trade Deficits Are a “Drag on Growth”, published April 11, 2011 by the Cato Institute. For more on Daniel Griswold, visit the Center for Trade Policy Studies

If you’re in San Diego, note that Griswold will participate in an international trade symposium at California State University San Marcos on Tuesday, June 21. Register here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: